Mathéo Ballasse
Product and B2C distribution expert: he frames the ICP, the go-to-market and the first 60 days for SaaS founders.
Recommendations from our editorial method.
No time to read?
Key takeaways
- A 0-to-1 roadmap serves one thing only: driving your first revenue, not filling the product.
- The right question is never "is it cool?" but "does it unlock a sale this week?".
- Your early adopters sort better than you do. Build what they ask for, park the rest.
You have a feature list as long as your arm. Each one feels essential, each one pushes back the moment you show the product to a real human. And while you build, the customer counter stays stuck at zero. It is the most common trap when launching a SaaS: confusing "a more complete product" with "a product that sells".
A product roadmap at the 0-to-1 stage has nothing to do with the roadmap of an established company. It is not there to plan twelve months of development. It exists to answer a single question, week after week: what gets you closer to your first recurring revenue? This guide gives you the sorting method, the rule for saying no, and a concrete 8-week roadmap to run starting now.

Why most of the features you build will serve no one
Before planning anything, keep one number in mind. According to Pendo's feature adoption report, 80% of a software's features are rarely or never used, and only around 12% generate the vast majority of daily usage. In other words: four out of five features you plan to build will change nothing for your users.
The problem runs deeper than wasted time. The number one cause of startup failure, according to the analysis of post-mortems by CB Insights, is no market need (42% of cases): building something nobody wanted. A roadmap that does not start from real demand walks you straight into that wall, feature after feature.
80%
of features rarely or never used (Pendo)
42%
of startups fail from no market need (CB Insights)
The lesson is not "build nothing". It is "build little, and build what triggers a transaction". Your roadmap is first a filter to eliminate the 80% that lead nowhere.
The mistake that sinks your SaaS: the gut-feel roadmap
The natural reflex is to sort by desire. You add the feature that feels elegant, the one a competitor shows, the one a user mentioned in passing. The result: a product that grows in every direction and excels at nothing, without a single one of those additions having moved a sale closer.
The real danger of the gut-feel roadmap is that it gives you the impression of progress. Every crossed-off line brings a small satisfaction. But moving forward on a product nobody asked for is not progress: it is postponing the moment of truth. The only indicator that matters at this stage is not the number of features shipped, it is the number of conversations that end in a "yes, I will pay".
A feature that unlocks no sale is not a priority. It is a well-disguised distraction.
So you need an objective sorting rule that replaces your desire of the moment with a cold question. That rule fits in one sentence.
The sorting rule: does it unlock a first revenue?
For each feature idea, ask a single question: does it unlock a sale this week, or in the next two? If the answer is no, it waits. Not "it will never happen": it waits until you have paying customers who genuinely ask for it.
Here is a decision grid to sort your current work. It helps you place each idea in the right column, without second-guessing.
| Situation | Build now | Push back after first revenue |
|---|---|---|
| A warm prospect says "I sign if it does X" | Yes, X is your top priority | No, it is urgent |
| A "clean" feature nobody asked for | No, no real demand | Yes, as long as no customer asks for it |
| The minimal path to deliver your promise | Yes, it is the core of the MVP | No, it is vital |
| A rich analytics dashboard | No, no data to display yet | Yes, while the product is empty |
| Integration asked by 3 prospects out of 5 | Yes, it is a real commercial blocker | No, it blocks sales |
| Design overhaul, dark mode, settings | No, it never made anyone sign | Yes, it waits for revenue |
The left column is your roadmap for the coming weeks. The right column is your "parking lot": you write everything down, you build nothing until a sale depends on it. That parking lot spares you the real hidden cost, the cost of maintaining functions nobody uses. The classic Standish Group report already estimated that 45% of features in production are never used: every line of code you do not write is a line you will not have to maintain later.
Saying no to features, the founder's hardest skill
Sorting is easy on paper. The hard part is saying no for real, especially when the idea comes from you or a friendly user. But a 0-to-1 roadmap is defined as much by what you refuse as by what you build.
The easy-yes trap
A user who suggests a feature commits to nothing. A user who says "I will pay if you add this" commits. Never build on a mere suggestion: always ask if it is a blocker to purchase. Nine times out of ten, the answer tells you to push it back.
The discipline of no rests on a simple principle: until you have paying customers, you have no reliable data on what to build. You have opinions, yours and those of curious onlookers. And free opinions are not worth purchase decisions. Every "no, not now" you say protects your time for the only thing that matters: reaching your first sale and listening to what it teaches you.
Let your early adopters drive the priorities
The best 0-to-1 roadmap is not the one you write alone in your corner. It is the one your first users help you write. They alone tell you, through their actions and their wallets, what really matters.

Concretely, that means setting up a feedback loop from the very first conversation. Each exchange with a prospect or a user gives you signals: what blocks them, what they ask for, what they ignore completely. You write everything down, you count the recurrences, and you let the count decide. A request that comes up with three prospects out of five goes ahead of your brilliant idea that nobody ever mentioned.
This is exactly the logic of continuous iteration with your first customers: you do not guess the roadmap, you deduce it from conversations. The role of your early adopters is not to validate your product, it is to correct it before you build the wrong thing at scale.
The signals that move a feature up your roadmap
0 / 4Your product roadmap over 8 weeks, step by step
Enough theory. Here is a concrete 0-to-1 roadmap, cut into four two-week blocks. It is not set in stone: it is a skeleton your conversations will adjust.
Weeks 1-2: the core that holds your promise
Weeks 3-4: put the product in real hands
Weeks 5-6: unlock the first sale
Weeks 7-8: repeat and count
Notice what this roadmap does not contain: no overhaul, no "nice to have" feature, no preparation for scale. All that will come, but only when recurring revenue justifies it. Before that, every week spent building for later is a week stolen from your first sale.
The traps that derail a 0-to-1 roadmap
Even with a good sorting rule, some reflexes come back. Keep this list in view when you feel your roadmap swelling for no reason.
- Building for a competitor, not a customer. Copying a rival's feature does not make you sign a customer. It makes you look like them without their audience.
- Confusing feedback with a marching order. A suggestion is not a command. Build only what is asked for strongly enough to block a purchase.
- Anticipating scale too early. Optimizing for 10,000 users when you have zero is solving a problem you do not have. The real problem is getting your first paying user.
- Polishing instead of selling. Design, settings, dark mode: none of that has ever triggered a first sale. It waits.
A SaaS startup's product roadmap is judged by one outcome: does it get you closer, week after week, to your first recurring revenue? If a line does not pass that test, it has no place in the next two weeks of your calendar.
To go further, your roadmap is built hand in hand with your minimum viable product: the MVP defines the core, the roadmap sorts what comes next. It also feeds on your search for product market fit, the real signal that tells you what to build next, and on a clear framing of jobs to be done to understand what your users are truly trying to accomplish.
Not sure where to start with distribution?
The diagnostic identifies the channel that will bring your first customers, so your roadmap actually serves a purpose.