Isidore Mikorey-Nilsson
Agentic dev and SaaS distribution expert: he builds the acquisition tools he deploys for SaaS founders.
Recommendations from our editorial method.
No time to read?
Key takeaways
- Vibe coding solves the "build", never the "sell": shipping fast doesn't create customers.
- Most SaaS that fail do so for lack of a market, not lack of code.
- The right order after the MVP: a clear problem, 20 named prospects, one channel at full effort.
A quarter of the startups in Y Combinator's latest batch have codebases that are 95% AI-generated, according to managing partner Jared Friedman as reported by TechCrunch. In other words: building a SaaS has never been faster. Vibe coding, the practice of describing what you want in plain language so an AI writes the code, has knocked down the technical barrier.
And yet the question that keeps you up at night hasn't shifted an inch: where are my customers? You have a product online, clean and functional. The user counter, meanwhile, is stuck at zero. That's the paradox of vibe coding: it makes the product easy and leaves untouched the only thing that truly matters early on, distribution.

Vibe coding solved the "build", not the "sell"
It needs to be said plainly, because nobody tells you: shipping a product was never the real problem for an early-stage SaaS. The real problem is finding enough people who have the problem you solve, and talking to them.
The hardest data point in the industry has been making that case for years. Based on its analysis of hundreds of post-mortems, CB Insights finds that the number one cause of startup failure, at 42%, is no market need: a product built that nobody wanted enough to pay for. Ahead of running out of cash, ahead of competition. Vibe coding doesn't touch that statistic. It just gets you faster to the moment you find out whether anyone wants what you built.
You don't have a product problem. You have a distribution problem.
That is exactly the trap Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: founders over-invest in the product and under-invest in distribution, because the product is what they control. Vibe coding amplifies that bias. Now that building costs a weekend instead of six months, the temptation to add, polish, and rebuild becomes enormous. And all the while, nobody is talking to a customer.
What vibe coding changes (and what it doesn't)
Let's look the numbers in the eye, because they map out a real opportunity, as long as you don't fight the wrong battle.
84%
of developers use or plan to use AI to write code
25%
of YC startups have a codebase that's 95% AI-generated
66%
cite AI code being 'almost right, but not quite' as their top frustration
The first two figures come respectively from the Stack Overflow 2025 Developer Survey and the same YC point. The third also comes from Stack Overflow, and it's valuable: even when AI writes your code, it gets you to "almost right", rarely to "finished and robust". Translation for you: vibe coding hands you a credible MVP in record time, but it gives you neither a finished product nor a single user.
What really changes is the balance of power. Before, knowing how to build was a competitive edge. Today, anyone can ship a decent product. So the edge shifts entirely toward what AI won't do for you: understanding a market, choosing a channel, writing a message that lands, holding a sales conversation. Distribution becomes the new code.
Common mistake
The reflex when you can ship a product fast is to ship a second one, then a third. Stacking AI-generated MVPs does not replace distributing a single one properly. A distributed product beats ten perfect products that nobody knows about.
The vibe-coding founder's trap
There's a very precise moment where many projects get lost. Your product runs, the demo works, you feel productive. So you go back into your editor, because that's where you're comfortable and where the AI gives you immediate, gratifying feedback. Adding a feature is concrete. Talking to a stranger who might say "no thanks" is uncomfortable.
Except the extra feature doesn't get you closer to a customer. It pushes you further away, because it gives you the illusion of progress. The real signal you're waiting for isn't "the code compiles", it's "someone pulled out their card".

Getting out of the trap fits in one sentence: force yourself a ratio. For every hour spent improving the product, one hour spent talking to people who might buy it. Very early on, that ratio should even tilt toward distribution, because that's where you learn what the product needs to become. Your first customers aren't buyers, they're teachers who also happen to pay.
From your AI-built product to your first clients: the playbook
Here's the concrete sequence to run once your SaaS is live. There's nothing technical about it, and that's precisely the point.
Write the problem in one sentence
List 20 named prospects
Open 5 conversations this week
Make a simple offer to the warmest one
Pick one channel and hold it for 30 days
Where to distribute, depending on your product
Vibe coding doesn't change the rules of distribution, but it changes your starting point: you already have something to show. So use it to choose the right channel instead of scattering.
| Your situation | Channel to test first | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Identifiable B2B target (role, sector) | Direct outbound (LinkedIn, cold email) | You go get each prospect by hand, fast feedback, high ticket |
| Very visual or consumer product | Communities and public demos | A screenshot or a quickly built demo spreads, the proof does the work |
| A topic you master and can explain | Content and SEO | Slow but compounding, each page works for you for months |
You don't have to find "the" perfect channel on the first try. You have to pick the first one, the one that fits your product and your target, and give it a real month of effort before judging.
My post-vibe-coding week
0 / 5Check them off as you go. The goal isn't perfection, it's having moved on all five lines by Friday, while your reflex wants to pull you back into the editor.
Turning vibe coding into a real strength
Vibe coding is a genuine opportunity: it lets you test an idea in a few days, iterate on something concrete with your first users, and never again get stuck on "I don't know how to build that". Used in the right order, it's an accelerator. Used as a hideout to avoid selling, it's a comfortable trap.
The right mindset: your AI-generated product isn't the end of the work, it's the ticket in. It lets you reach sooner the one question that decides your future, the question of the market. Treat every customer conversation as the real feature you're building this week.
To go further, keep things in the right order: lay clean foundations with our guide to building a SaaS, tackle distribution with the method to find your first 10 SaaS customers, and use those first sales to validate your SaaS product market fit before thinking about scaling.
Your SaaS is built. So how do you sell it?
Answer two questions and walk away with the channel to start with, matched to your product and your target.
Frequently asked questions
- Is vibe coding enough to launch a SaaS?
- Vibe coding is enough to build the product, not to sell it. It saves you weeks on code, but your first customers come from conversations, a clear problem, and a chosen distribution channel. An AI-generated product with no distribution is still a product with no customers.
- Do you need to know how to code to vibe-code?
- No. A large share of vibe coding users are not developers. Today's tools let you describe what you want in plain language and get a working app. The real bottleneck is no longer technical, it's commercial: finding who has the problem and how to reach them.
- What is the main vibe coding trap for a founder?
- Adding features instead of talking to customers. Because building is fast and rewarding, you iterate on the product for weeks without ever validating that anyone would pay. The classic trap: a flawless SaaS that nobody asked for.